REIKI SYMBOLS
- Facts, Fiction or 'Japanese Whispers'?
Copyright
© 2008 James Deacon
Probably
most people have now heard the often-repeated story of how, supposedly,
in the beginning Usui-sensei did not teach the use of symbols
to his students - that
the symbols were something he added to the system later in it's
development, in order - it is suggested - to help students feel
and differentiate between certain aspects of the 'energy'.
Of
course the story could be true. [And this would be a very short
article.]
However, it has on occasion been suggested that this story is
simply a modern fiction - an attempt at creating a piece of 'supporting
testimony' intended to lend weight to the views held by some within
the Reiki Community who would wish to eradicate use of the symbols
from the discipline entirely.
Usually the thinking is expressed something along the lines of
"Well, if the symbols weren't part of the original
system they can't be that important - can't really be all
that relevant -can they? So lets just ditch 'em!"
[- and, I feel, comments to this effect are probably often followed
by the silent thought: "Afterall, I never could quite get
the hang of remembering how to draw them complicated little ****ers!]
Strangely,
several of those people in the pro-"ditch the symbols"
camp, also claim that Reiki has its origins strongly
rooted in Esoteric (Mikkyo) Buddhist practice. [It would
seem such people are completely oblivious as to the essential
and empowering role of symbols (to effect both 'this-worldly'
and 'other-worldly' healing and transformation) within the Mikkyo
traditions...!]
So,
the story that the symbols were something Usui-sensei added to
the system later in it's development: Truth? Fiction?
There
is of course another option - that the story has its basis
in some sort of fact, yet due to a mild case of 'Chinese Whispers'
(or in this instance 'Japanese Whispers' !) it has become
ever so slightly confused on its journey down through the
years to us.
What
if the original story - the fact behind the whispers - rather
than stating that the symbols were something only introduced to
the system later in it's development, simply actually
spoke of how the symbols were something only introduced to
the student at a later stage in their development?
We often hear how, in Takata-sensei's day, the
symbols were considered something to be kept secret.[1]
However, it may be more correct to say that rather than it being
just a matter of simply not letting non Level 2 Reiki folk see
the symbols - it was a case that even the
very fact that there were symbols at all was to
be kept secret.
Not
only were the symbols not shown to, or even discussed
with, Level 1 students, the very existence of symbols was not
even mentioned.
While the symbols were obviously used by Takata-sensei as part
of the Reiki initiations (though, of course, not all symbols
were used in every level initiation), it was not until
Level 2 that the symbols, their form and usage, were introduced
to the student as part of their training.
It
may well be that the primary reason for wanting to keep the symbols
(/their very existence), secret from those doing Level 1 training,
was to keep the student's focus 'in the present moment'; rather
than fueling their curiosity, imagination, and impatience to move
on to 'higher' things - when they had not yet even learnt and
integrated the basics of what the system had to offer at the earliest
stages of training
Likewise, the Level 2 student, having been introduced to the three
symbols at that level, was not informed about the fourth symbol.
It
was only on being accepted as a level 3 [2]
student that the existence of this final symbol was revealed.
Jump back now to the 1920's...
From
several different sources, there have been several somewhat different
accounts as to the level-structure within Usui-sensei's system
in the early years.
However, we know from the Question and Answer section of the Usui
Reiki Ryoho Hikkei, that Usui-sensei divided training into
three (main [3]) tiers
or levels: Shoden, Okuden, and Shinpiden
And
while some of the developmental and therapeutic practices taught
at each of these levels may not have survived intact - essentially,
this training structure was very similar to the "Level 1,
Level 2, Master Level" structure most of us in the West are
familiar with via Takata-sensei's teachings.
It
is said that Usui-sensei's students numbered somewhere in the
region of two thousand, with the greater majority of these being
Shoden level.
Far
fewer would have received training at Okuden; and we are told,
less than 20 received Shinpiden level - i.e. became Teachers.
As
we have seen, in Takata-sensei's day, even the very existence
of the symbols was kept secret from Level 1 students; and it is
fair to assume that it would have been no different with Usui-sensei's
Shoden level students.
In
discussing their training and practice amongst themselves, or
- should they be tempted to - in sharing information about the
system with family, friends or even outsiders, there would be
no knowledge of symbols - only mindfulness in applying 'hands
that bring healing'.
As
far as these Shoden level students would be aware, there were
no symbols used in this therapeutic art.
Likewise,
those students who had reached the next stage in their development
- the Okuden level - would only be aware of there being three
symbols - would not have even heard of there being a fourth.
Which leads to the question - the sources who claim that "originally
there were no symbols in Reiki"
- is it simply that their information comes (however indirectly)
from students who never progressed beyond Shoden level training?
And for that matter - the sources who more recently have begun
to claim that "there were only ever three symbols in Reiki,
not four"
- is it simply that their information comes (however indirectly)
from students who never progressed beyond Okuden level training?
_______
NOTES:
[1]
While
the four Usui symbols are considered by many of us to be Sacred
(or at least, of sacred significance), ever since two
of the symbols were first revealed in a Reiki book: 'The Challenge
To Teach Reiki' by A.J. MacKenzie Clay, (published in 1992), the
belief in the need to keep them secret is no longer generally
considered relevant.
[2]
Or as Takata-sensei had called it [on the certificates she issued]
the 'Advanced' level.
[3]
Though it would seem that these levels may have themselves been
divided into a number of subsections at different periods over
the short few years during which Usui-sensei taught his system